snow job — a systematic deception; a deceptive story that tries to hide the truth. You can generally tell when a student is trying to do a snow job. This snow job you call an explanation just won't do.
cheap shot 1. (in sports) a blow, shove, or tackle maliciously directed against an opponent who is defenseless or off guard. 2. any mean or unsportsmanlike remark or action, esp. one directed at a defenseless or vulnerable person.
у кого-то множественные личности образовались по причине психического заболевания, а у меня есть вторичная в силу профессии. вернее, две вторичных, развиваю третью.
Wednesday, 12 March, 2003 French fries in the House of Representatives' cafeterias will now be known as "freedom fries" as part of a Republican protest at France's opposition to a war on Iraq. BBC News
jump the shark 1. (idiomatic, of a television program or other narrative) To undergo a storyline development which heralds a fundamental and generally disappointing change in direction. 2. (more generally) To experience a decline in quality, appeal, popularity, etc.
Davy Jones's Locker is an idiom for the bottom of the sea: the state of death among drowned sailors. It is used as an euphemism for death at sea (to be sent to Davy Jones's Locker). [link]
Гармония сфер — представления древнегреческих мыслителей о музыкальном звучании планет, солнца, луны и их сфер, о музыкально-математической архитектонике космоса.
Here goes nothing. Inf. I am beginning to do something that will fail or be poorly done. (A positive outcome is not expected but I'm going to try anyway.)
pony 5. (US, slang) a literal translation used by students, often illicitly, in preparation for foreign language lessons or examinations (подстрочник) collins, между прочим!
отсюда: дареному переводу в зубы не смотрят. а также: по коням, переводчики, нас ждут великие дела!
читаю "Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman!" и всем советую.
хомо гуманитариус в разрезеIn the Graduate College dining room at Princeton everybody used to sit with his own group. I sat with the physicists, but after a bit I thought: It would be nice to see what the rest of the world is doing, so I'll sit for a week or two in each of the other groups. When I sat with the philosophers I listened to them discuss very seriously a book called Process and Reality by Whitehead. They were using words in a funny way, and I couldn't quite understand what they were saying. Now I didn't want to interrupt them in their own conversation and keep asking them to explain something, and on the few occasions that I did, they'd try to explain it to me, but I still didn't get it. Finally they invited me to come to their seminar. They had a seminar that was like a class. It had been meeting once a week to discuss a new chapter out of Process and Reality -- some guy would give a report on it and then there would be a discussion. I went to this seminar promising myself to keep my mouth shut, reminding myself that I didn't know anything about the subject, and I was going there just to watch. What happened there was typical -- so typical that it was unbelievable, but true. First of all, I sat there without saying anything, which is almost unbelievable, but also true. A student gave a report on the chapter to be studied that week. In it Whitehead kept using the words "essential object" in a particular technical way that presumably he had defined, but that I didn't understand. After some discussion as to what "essential object" meant, the professor leading the seminar said something meant to clarify things and drew something that looked like lightning bolts on the blackboard. "Mr. Feynman," he said, "would you say an electron is an 'essential object'?" Well, now I was in trouble. I admitted that I hadn't read the book, so I had no idea of what Whitehead meant by the phrase; I had only come to watch. "But," I said, "I'll try to answer the professor's question if you will first answer a question from me, so I can have a better idea of what 'essential object' means. Is a brick an essential object?" What I had intended to do was to find out whether they thought theoretical constructs were essential objects. The electron is a theory that we use; it is so useful in understanding the way nature works that we can almost call it real. I wanted to make the idea of a theory clear by analogy. In the case of the brick, my next question was going to be, "What about the inside of the brick?" -- and I would then point out that no one has ever seen the inside of a brick. Every time you break the brick, you only see the surface. That the brick has an inside is a simple theory which helps us understand things better. The theory of electrons is analogous. So I began by asking, "Is a brick an essential object?" Then the answers came out. One man stood up and said, "A brick as an individual, specific brick. That is what Whitehead means by an essential object." Another man said, "No, it isn't the individual brick that is an essential object; it's the general character that all bricks have in common -- their 'brickness' -- that is the essential object." Another guy got up and said, "No, it's not in the bricks themselves. 'Essential object' means the idea in the mind that you get when you think of bricks." Another guy got up, and another, and I tell you I have never heard such ingenious different ways of looking at a brick before.